Connecticut Magazine Rates State Cities and Towns (Part 1)

by The Harriman Team on November 16, 2009

CT Magazine Rates State Cities and Towns

ConnecticutCities

In the November issue of Connecticut Magazine, the Trumbull-based  publication has, for the first time since 2006, provided a look at how various cities and towns rank based on several criteria. They first sorted the localities into four groups based on population:

  • 10,000 – 15,000
  • 15,000 – 25,000
  • 25,000 – 50,000
  • 50,000+ (Towns with populations below 10,000 will be featured in their own rankings in the March 2010 issue; see here for the 2007 rankings)

Then, information was collected in the quality-of-life criteria that are most important to residents:

  • Schools
  • Crime Rate
  • Cost of Living
  • Local Economy
  • Leisure/Cultural Outlets

Then the numbers were crunched and rankings were awarded based on how the towns scored in those criteria, with a “1” being the best score possible. In this four part series of posts, we’re going to highlight how some towns in our market area fared, as well as the rest of the rankings. So, without an further ado, here’s Part One:

50,000+ : Hamden Hangs In There, Meriden Trails

There were 17 cities on the list in this category, represented by Hamden and Meriden. Hamden did well, placing 7th on the list (but down from 5th in the last rankings) and scoring high in the Crime Rate behind only Fairfield and Greenwich. Hamden did poorest in the area of Leisure/Culture, scoring only 14th out of 17.

Meriden, surprisingly, tied for last place among these 17 cities, doing well in Cost of Living (5th), but finishing last in Leisure/Culture. It was in 12th place for each of the other 3 categories. It is interesting to note that, in the Cost of Living area, the top cities on the list had the highest cost of living, while they scored very well in the other areas. Here’s the chart of results:

Town                   Education     Crime        Economy      Cost                  Leisure           Total

Fairfield12215424
Greenwich21117526
W. Htfd36711633
Stamford77316336
Milford454121237
Danbury94613941
Hamden838101443
Manchester69971344
Norwalk1011514747
Bristol581091648
New Haven1416146151
Waterbury1314161852
W.Haven11101181555
Hartford1717173256
New Britain15131521156
Bridgeport16151341058
Meriden12121251758

According to these rankings, it appears that the state’s big cities continue to struggle with low educational scores, elevated crime rates and unstable economies. Hartford finished dead last in all three of those categories, while New Haven, Bridgeport and Waterbury all showed poorly as well. However, these localities also provide some of the state’s best leisure and cultural amenities.

Remember, these rankings are not to be considered the last word in what the quality of life is in a particular city/town; however, they are a starting point and can be used as a point of comparison when making a decision about where to live in the state. There are many reasons for liking –or not liking – a specific city or town that transcend any statistical ranking or report, and only you can decide if a place is right for you and your family.

In Part Two of this series, we’ll take a look at the next population size, cities between 25,000 and 50,000 residents. To see these results in their entirety, pick up a copy of Connecticut Magazine’s November issue, on sale now at your favorite store or newsstand.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Welcome back!

{ 3 trackbacks }

Connecticut Magazine Rates State Cities and Towns (Part 2) | Wallingford Wired
November 19, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Connecticut Magazine Rates State Cities and Towns (Part 3) | Wallingford Wired
November 30, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Connecticut Magazine Rates State Cities and Towns (Part 4) | Wallingford Wired
December 11, 2009 at 8:43 pm

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 DM December 3, 2009 at 4:39 pm

These polls are kind of a joke.

So Fairfield is the #1 place to live???? What is the average cost of a tiny house??? $750k??

2 The Harriman Team December 4, 2009 at 7:36 pm

Actually, Fairfield was ranked as the #1 place to live only among its population group, 50,000 residents and over, not in the whole state. I would wager that, if all 169 towns were compared to each other equally without regard for population, that Fairfield would not be #1 for the entire state. That honor would probably fall to one of the smaller towns, perhaps Ridgefield or even one of the towns not included in these ratings with populations under 10,000.

As for the average cost of a home in Fairfield, you’re not far off. For all homes sold in that town in the first 11 months of 2009, the average sales price was $707,474.

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled